Back to home
INTERNATIONAL13 July 2026
The Final Verdict: Sudan's RSF Commander Faces Death Sentence for War Crimes
Sudan’s highest court sentenced RSF chief Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo to death in absentia, along with fifteen senior commanders, for war crimes including systematic rape and civilian bombings. The ruling underscores a rare moment of judicial accountability amid a protracted conflict.
La
La Rédaction
The Vertex
5 min read

Source: www.bbc.co.uk
In the war‑torn capital of Khartoum, a rare moment of judicial finality unfolded as Sudan’s highest court handed down a death sentence to Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, the commander of the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The ruling, delivered in absentia, also condemned fifteen senior RSF officers and affiliated militia leaders for crimes ranging from systematic rape to the indiscriminate shelling of civilian areas. While Dagalo remains at large, the verdict marks a decisive, if symbolic, assertion of accountability in a conflict that has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives.
The decision underscores the gravity of the accusations: the court found that the RSF’s campaign of terror, which included the siege of El Fasher and the massacre of civilians in Darfur, constituted war crimes under Sudanese and international law. By sentencing its own commander to capital punishment, the judiciary attempted to reassert state authority that has been eroded by competing militias and a fractured transitional government. Yet the practical impact remains uncertain, given the RSF’s entrenched military capabilities and its alliances with regional actors.
Contextualizing the verdict within the broader saga of Sudan’s civil war reveals a pattern of impunity that has persisted since the 1989 coup. Previous attempts to prosecute militia leaders have been thwarted by political compromises and ongoing hostilities. The RSF’s rise, originally a proxy force for the former regime, has complicated peace negotiations and deepened the humanitarian crisis, displacing millions and destabilizing neighboring states.
Looking ahead, the death sentence may serve as a catalyst for renewed diplomatic pressure, but it also risks inflaming tensions if the RSF perceives the ruling as a betrayal. Whether this judicial act can translate into genuine accountability or merely become another chapter in Sudan’s protracted tragedy remains the central question for the country’s fragile transition.